2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating cancelable palmprint templates via coupled nonlinear dynamic filters and multiple orientation palmcodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biometrics are divided into: Static or permanent characteristics . Static biometrics are mostly physical features which do not change or the changes are minor over the life span such as fingerprints (Jain et al ., 2001), palm prints (Li et al ., 2010), face dynamics (Connolly et al ., 2012), retina (Saraswathi et al ., 2011), iris (Sanchez-Avila and Sanchez-Reillo, 2005), tongue shape (Huang et al ., 2010), etc. Dynamic or soft characteristics . Dynamic or soft biometrics are behavioral characteristics which change rapidly such as gait (Kale et al ., 2004), keystroke dynamics (Bergadano et al ., 2002), handwriting (Ramann et al ., 2002; Ballard et al ., 2006), lip movement (Luettin et al ., 1996; Shipilova, 2006), voice/speech (Sanderson and Paliwal, 2001), blinking (Westeyn et al ., 2005), etc. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometrics are divided into: Static or permanent characteristics . Static biometrics are mostly physical features which do not change or the changes are minor over the life span such as fingerprints (Jain et al ., 2001), palm prints (Li et al ., 2010), face dynamics (Connolly et al ., 2012), retina (Saraswathi et al ., 2011), iris (Sanchez-Avila and Sanchez-Reillo, 2005), tongue shape (Huang et al ., 2010), etc. Dynamic or soft characteristics . Dynamic or soft biometrics are behavioral characteristics which change rapidly such as gait (Kale et al ., 2004), keystroke dynamics (Bergadano et al ., 2002), handwriting (Ramann et al ., 2002; Ballard et al ., 2006), lip movement (Luettin et al ., 1996; Shipilova, 2006), voice/speech (Sanderson and Paliwal, 2001), blinking (Westeyn et al ., 2005), etc. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, a transformed version of the original template is stored, named cancelable biometric template [12]. For palmprint based authentication system, the idea of cancelable palmprint biometric has been introduced in, which can protect the original palmprint template as well as revoke and reissue novel template when the old ones are lost or stolen [13][14][15]. In order to solve the intra-class template variation problem while maintaining the template, a hybrid palmprint template protection scheme is proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, a novel cancelable is generated by measuring the Gabor based palmprint image with a chaotic random matrix. The basic idea is to transform a real value palmprint feature vector into a binary feature vector using a chaotic random matrix(The chaotic cipher has application in biometric security [13,16]). Then, the obtained Gabor representation is compared with a chaotic random matrix to generate cancelable palmprint template.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometric authentication [17,27] consists of verifying individuals based on their physiognomical and behavioral traits such as face [9], fingerprints [19], palmprints [26], iris [34], tongue shape [16], etc. Biometric systems offer obvious advantages over other authentication systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%