2020
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generally Curious: Thematically Distinct Datasets of General Threads on 4chan/pol/

Abstract: Over the second half of the 2010s, the /pol/ (‘politically incorrect’) forum on the 4chan image board has emerged as a space within which various extreme political ideologies are discussed and cultivated, occasionally informing off-site acts of political extremism. While previous research has often studied this space as a unified whole, it is relevant to more specifically demarcate different publics within 4chan’s /pol/ board, apart from studying it as an ‘amorphous blob’. This paper focuses specifically on ‘g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is also subject to such generalizations. Doing justice to the complexity of 4chan and (especially) Reddit is troublesome due to their sheer size and variation; for every argument, there will be another board or subreddit to present a counterargument (Jokubauskaitė & Peeters, 2020; Massanari, 2017). As Proferes et al (2021) warn in their meta-study on Reddit research, “each subreddit has their own individual norms and cultures, as well as moderation practices, meaning insights from social phenomena in one subreddit may not translate across contexts” (p. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is also subject to such generalizations. Doing justice to the complexity of 4chan and (especially) Reddit is troublesome due to their sheer size and variation; for every argument, there will be another board or subreddit to present a counterargument (Jokubauskaitė & Peeters, 2020; Massanari, 2017). As Proferes et al (2021) warn in their meta-study on Reddit research, “each subreddit has their own individual norms and cultures, as well as moderation practices, meaning insights from social phenomena in one subreddit may not translate across contexts” (p. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is collected continuously (as it is posted on 4chan) by the tool itself and, for the period prior to 2018, supplemented with data from 4plebs.org, a third-party 4chan archive which publishes semi-regular data "dumps" on the Internet Archive, containing all posts made on a number of 4chan's boards, including /pol/. (Merged 4plebs' and 4CAT's datasets have been used in other research on 4chan, too (Tuters and Hagen, 2019;Voué et al, 2020;Jokubauskaitė and Peeters, 2020).) Notably, posts are included even if they are later deleted from the site, as all posts eventually disappear from 4chan itself, as threads are deleted after a period of inactivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tweets from organizations that the Southern Poverty Law Center labels as white supremacist hate groups [19,47] are also included. This dataset filters 4chan /pol/ data, an imageboard known for white supremacy, to posts from users choosing Nazi, Confederate, Fascist, and White Supremacist flags (in the dataset from Papasavva et al [42]), as well as posts in "general" threads with fascist and white supremacist topics (in the dataset from Jokubauskaitė and Peeters [32]). We also include smaller datasets manually annotated for white supremacist ideology from Rieger et al [49], Siegel et al [52], and Alatawi et al [1].…”
Section: Online Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%