2000
DOI: 10.1006/jctb.1999.1947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Δ–Y Exchange and k-Regular Matroids

Abstract: This paper introduces a generalization of the matroid operation of 2 Y exchange. This new operation, segment cosegment exchange, replaces a coindependent set of k collinear points in a matroid by an independent set of k points that are collinear in the dual of the resulting matroid. The main theorem of the first half of the paper is that, for every field, or indeed partial field, F, the class of matroids representable over F is closed under segment cosegment exchanges. It follows that, for all prime powers q, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further weakening, fork connectivity, was introduced by Oxley et al [21]. This notion of connectivity is related to a generalization of the familiar -Y exchange introduced by Oxley et al [20]. It is shown in [21] that Conjecture 9.1 holds if and only if it holds for fork-connected matroids.…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A further weakening, fork connectivity, was introduced by Oxley et al [21]. This notion of connectivity is related to a generalization of the familiar -Y exchange introduced by Oxley et al [20]. It is shown in [21] that Conjecture 9.1 holds if and only if it holds for fork-connected matroids.…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such is indeed the case for ternary matroids: U 2, 3 is a universal stabilizer for the class of ternary matroids with no U 2, 4 -minor and U 2, 4 is a universal stabilizer for the class of all ternary matroids. Also, universal stabilizers have recently proved a very useful tool in the characterizations of [19]. Unfortunately, an example in [10] shows, it seems, that, for classes beyond subclasses of binary and ternary matroids, it is often too much to ask for a reasonable set of universal stabilizers.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To prove Theorem 1.1, we use the theory of totally free matroids developed in [2] and the theory of segment-cosegment exchanges introduced by Oxley, Semple and Vertigan [5]. While we restate enough material from [2,5] to make this paper essentially self-contained, familiarity with these papers would be an advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While we restate enough material from [2,5] to make this paper essentially self-contained, familiarity with these papers would be an advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%