2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2925093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Zero Shot Learning via Synthesis Pseudo Features

Abstract: Compared with conventional zero-shot learning (ZSL), generalized ZSL (GZSL) is more challenging because the test instances may come from seen and unseen classes. The most existing GZSL methods learn a visual-semantic mapping function to bridge the knowledge transfer from seen to unseen classes by using semantic information and other labeled training data. However, these methods often suffer from severe performance degradation because they ignore similar structures between different classes.To solve these probl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In TZSL, the search space is C u , i.e., Y = C u . Our algorithm is compared with 10 recently proposed baseline algorithms for TZSL task, including DEVISE [7], SJE [44], ALE [11], SYNC [18], SAE [13], DEM [14], GFZSL [45], LESAE [46], PSR [24], and RAS-GAN [26]. To show the effectiveness of the proposed, we compared the simulated results with 10 other algorithms.…”
Section: B Results On Traditional Zero-shot Learning (Tzsl) Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In TZSL, the search space is C u , i.e., Y = C u . Our algorithm is compared with 10 recently proposed baseline algorithms for TZSL task, including DEVISE [7], SJE [44], ALE [11], SYNC [18], SAE [13], DEM [14], GFZSL [45], LESAE [46], PSR [24], and RAS-GAN [26]. To show the effectiveness of the proposed, we compared the simulated results with 10 other algorithms.…”
Section: B Results On Traditional Zero-shot Learning (Tzsl) Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical synthesisbased methods include the followings. SPF [24] calculates the semantic attributes correlation between the seen and unseen classes to find out several seen classes that most similar to the unseen classes. And then it uses the visual features of the seen classes to multiply the similarity coefficient to synthesize the visual features of the unseen classes.…”
Section: Related Work a Zero-shot Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFMR [ 193 ] exploits the manifold structure of test data with a joint prediction scheme to avoid domain shift [ 138 ]. use entropy minimisation in optimisation [ 86 ]. preserve the semantic similarity structure in seen and unseen classes to avoid the domain-shift occurrence [ 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZSL models can be seen from two points of views in terms of training and test phase: Classic ZSL and Generalised ZSL (GZSL) settings. In the classic ZSL settings, the model only detects the presence of new classes at the test phase, while in GZSL settings, the model predicts both unseen and seen classes at the test time; hence, GZSL is more applicable for real-world scenarios [ 94 ], [ 75 ], [ 210 ], [ 86 ], [ 145 ]. The same idea can be applied to FSL to train in the generalised model, called generalised few-shot learning (GFSL) that detects both known and novel classes at the test time.…”
Section: Zsl Test and Training Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation