2016
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2016.2532123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Terrain Topography in Radar Scattering Models

Abstract: Modeling of terrain topography is crucial for vegetated areas given that even small slopes impact and alter the radar wave interactions between the ground and the overlying vegetation. Current missions either exclude pixels with large topographic slopes or disregard the terrain topography entirely, potentially accumulating substantial modeling errors and therefore impacting the retrieval performance over such sloped pixels. The underlying terrain topography needs to be considered and modeled to obtain a truly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we assumed that the scattering from the top canopy layer in the presence of topography remains the same as for a flat terrain. When a slope is present, the crown thickness along the propagation path is different [34]; this effect needs to be included in the modeling of crown attenuation. In this version of SAVERS, it is possible to compute the correct path through the vegetation as the local incidence and scattering angles are computed for each facet of the simulation grid.…”
Section: Vegetation Over a Sloped Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assumed that the scattering from the top canopy layer in the presence of topography remains the same as for a flat terrain. When a slope is present, the crown thickness along the propagation path is different [34]; this effect needs to be included in the modeling of crown attenuation. In this version of SAVERS, it is possible to compute the correct path through the vegetation as the local incidence and scattering angles are computed for each facet of the simulation grid.…”
Section: Vegetation Over a Sloped Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groundbranch/trunk double-bounce bistatic scattering contribution is equivalent to branch/trunkground double-bounce bistatic scattering contribution. According to [33], the scattering pattern of a vertically oriented finite cylinder resembles a cone. In particular, the scattering pattern of a finite cylinder presents a strong response in the specular direction.…”
Section: Branch-ground (Bg) and Trunk-ground (Tg) Double-bounce Bista...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where incident and scattering paths are denoted as i and s, respectively, and ground, branch, and trunk are expressed as G, B, and T, respectively. Moreover, the T matrixes present the transmission Stokes matrixes related to the transmission of the wave through vegetation layers (branches and trunks) [33]. Ultimately, for incoherent scattering components, the total bistatic Stokes matrix M total presented in Equation ( 2) is converted to co-pol and crosspol linearly polarized total NBRCS σ 0 total by the method in [32].…”
Section: Total Bistatic Scattering Stokes Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%