2022
DOI: 10.1007/s44150-021-00019-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized temperature-dependent material models for compressive strength of masonry using fire tests, statistical methods and artificial intelligence

Abstract: Masonry has superior fire resistance properties stemming from its inert characteristics, and slow degradation of mechanical properties. However, once exposed to fire conditions, masonry undergoes a series of physio-chemical changes. Such changes are often described via temperature-dependent material models. Despite calls for standardization of such models, there is a lack in such standardized models. As a result, available temperature-dependent material models vary across various fire codes and standards. In o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative analysis of our test results pertaining to the residual strength and while hot (bot which was unstressed) notes that there is an additional loss of strength observed for the residual specimens (i.e., those heated and cooled down to ambient conditions and then tested after 2 weeks). This analysis agrees with that reported by Abrams 43 and Malhotra, 44 who, individually, reported a difference of about 20% between the two states.…”
Section: Hot Statesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comparative analysis of our test results pertaining to the residual strength and while hot (bot which was unstressed) notes that there is an additional loss of strength observed for the residual specimens (i.e., those heated and cooled down to ambient conditions and then tested after 2 weeks). This analysis agrees with that reported by Abrams 43 and Malhotra, 44 who, individually, reported a difference of about 20% between the two states.…”
Section: Hot Statesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, at 200°C, a 10% increase in compressive strength was observed in Abrams 42 . This slight increase is possibly due to the presence of lightweight aggregate 43 . The same effect is not apparent in the residual conditions.…”
Section: Results Of Fire Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To develop an appropriate methodology, statistical and ANN models were constructed, ran in parallel, and finally compared with each other. Utilising experimental data previously published in scientific literature, the prediction of the residual compressive capacity of masonry post exposure to fire was made possible without further testing or FE modelling [54]. Instead of trying to understand the performance of walls post fire exposure, other studies tried to optimise their design and thermal behaviour at the specification stage.…”
Section: Optimisation and Standardisation Of Designmentioning
confidence: 99%