1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02434927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Sperner lemma and subdivisions into simplices of equal volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1994 Bekker and Netsvetaev proved similar statement in higher dimensions [1]. 1 By the phrase polygon B is cut into triangles we mean that B can be presented as a union of a finite number of triangles so that the interiors of the triangles have an empty intersection with each other. Fig.…”
Section: Equidissection Problemmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In 1994 Bekker and Netsvetaev proved similar statement in higher dimensions [1]. 1 By the phrase polygon B is cut into triangles we mean that B can be presented as a union of a finite number of triangles so that the interiors of the triangles have an empty intersection with each other. Fig.…”
Section: Equidissection Problemmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sperner's Lemma for polytopes. We now describe a more general Sperner's Lemma-type of result for polytopes, following [4]. A related result can be found in [16].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1. By taking into account the orientation of the polytope, we get here a definition of the index slightly different from the one in [4], which uses Z 2 indices in the above recursive definition. We note that the definition of the index in [4] is inconsistent with some of the results later in that paper, e.g., with Proposition 1 quoted below.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we describe a more general Sperner lemma-type of result for convex polytopes (which shall be referred to as polytopes), following [BN98]. We use the result to prove another generalization of Sperner's lemma, Theorem 3.4, one which can be directly used to prove Kakutani's theorem.…”
Section: Polytope Version Of Sperner's Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is a generalization of Sperner's lemma from [BN98]. We provide the proof for clarification and to ensure that the upcoming proof for Theorem 3.4 is intuitive.…”
Section: Proposition 31 ([Bn98]mentioning
confidence: 99%