2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11761-014-0167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized semantic Web service composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bansal et al [17] discuss SWS composition by developing a Prolog-based discovery and composition, the repository of facts deriving from the semantic descriptions of services expressed in Universal Service-Semantics Description Language (USDL) [18]. The discovery of services is based on mapping between those services USDL descriptions, description of the composition requirements, and WordNet [19] (or a domain-specific ontology).…”
Section: Semantic Web Services Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bansal et al [17] discuss SWS composition by developing a Prolog-based discovery and composition, the repository of facts deriving from the semantic descriptions of services expressed in Universal Service-Semantics Description Language (USDL) [18]. The discovery of services is based on mapping between those services USDL descriptions, description of the composition requirements, and WordNet [19] (or a domain-specific ontology).…”
Section: Semantic Web Services Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those input values may only be the set of inputs provided by the user, as the QoS algorithm elects services before the execution phase and therefore only accesses user-given input values. The first parameter therefore expresses that, for a given set of inputs values for the composition, a service has been used inside the composition and provided useful results (this parameter is tested in lines [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Quality Of Service Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature allows ASON to assume the role of a service directory, along with a service ontology and a domain ontology. In contrast, existing approaches for service composition require the use of a services registry in addition to semantic reconciliation between service capabilities and the description of the application domain (Bansal et al, 2014).…”
Section: Formalization and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of García-Sánchez [ 33 ] proposed an agent-based framework for service integration and interoperability in an e-Government domain, in which the discovery agent is represented for matchmaking and composing services through the SWS and ontology concepts mapping. Another work was proposed by Bansal et al [ 34 ], who presented a generalized semantics-based technique for automatic service composition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%