2021
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1994969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized self-efficacy and compliance with health behaviours related to COVID-19 in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the former promotes, the latter hinders the engagement in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that while people with high levels of R-SE perceive themselves as being able to self-regulate and have confidence that their own behaviors can help reduce the likelihood of getting and transmitting the COVID-19 virus ( Hamerman et al., 2021 ), people that hold beliefs in CTs are less prone to comply with the recommended measures ( Maftei and Holman, 2022 ). This result may be explained by the fact that people that hold beliefs in CTs also detain alternative explanations for the origin of the pandemic and so they underestimate the credibility of the information disseminated by the government as well as the perceived usefulness of the recommended measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While the former promotes, the latter hinders the engagement in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that while people with high levels of R-SE perceive themselves as being able to self-regulate and have confidence that their own behaviors can help reduce the likelihood of getting and transmitting the COVID-19 virus ( Hamerman et al., 2021 ), people that hold beliefs in CTs are less prone to comply with the recommended measures ( Maftei and Holman, 2022 ). This result may be explained by the fact that people that hold beliefs in CTs also detain alternative explanations for the origin of the pandemic and so they underestimate the credibility of the information disseminated by the government as well as the perceived usefulness of the recommended measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The inclusion criteria include the following aspects: (1) meeting CKD diagnostic criteria and confirmed by laboratory examination; (2) normal communication and feedback; (3) receiving dialysis treatment for more than 3 months; (4) complete clinical data; and (5) this is the first visit to the hospital [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Clinical Treatment Methods and Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has since revealed some predictors of higher compliance with public health measures during the pandemic, notably older age ( Brouard et al, 2020 ; Haischer et al, 2020 ; Solomou and Constantinidou, 2020 ) and female gender ( Clark et al, 2020 ; Galasso et al, 2020 ; Haischer et al, 2020 ; Solomou and Constantinidou, 2020 ; Nivette et al, 2021 ). Higher self-efficacy ( Clark et al, 2020 ; Hamerman et al, 2021 ; Jørgensen et al, 2021 ), higher perceived vulnerability to disease ( De Coninck et al, 2020 ; Hromatko et al, 2021 ), higher trust in science ( Hromatko et al, 2021 ; Plohl and Musil, 2021 ), prosocial personality traits ( Dinić and Bodroža, 2021 ; Nivette et al, 2021 ; Ścigała et al, 2021 ), and lower exposure to misinformation ( Roozenbeek et al, 2020 ; Simonov et al, 2020 ; Greene and Murphy, 2021 ; Lin, 2022 ) have also been linked to higher compliance with public measures. We aimed to investigate whether pandemic-related affective states also predicted compliance with public health measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%