2018
DOI: 10.13164/re.2018.1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Roughness Bearing Faults Diagnosis Based on Induction Motor Stator Current

Abstract: Despite their reliability, induction motors tend to fail. Around 41% of faults in motors are bearing related and that is the most common fault in motor field. Due to the lack of research on generalized roughness bearing fault diagnostics by use of a stator current spectrum, the presented study analyses both single-point and generalized roughness bearing faults and their classification possibilities. In this paper, a new method for generalized roughness ball bearing fault identification by use of a stator curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNNs have been used to diagnose faults successfully; they outperform their static counterparts and can learn the dynamics of complex nonlinear systems which the standard static NN cannot describe. An aircraft actuator is a dynamic system so the use of TDNN for fault diagnosis is more suitable compared with the static neural network that is implemented in most of the previous work [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNNs have been used to diagnose faults successfully; they outperform their static counterparts and can learn the dynamics of complex nonlinear systems which the standard static NN cannot describe. An aircraft actuator is a dynamic system so the use of TDNN for fault diagnosis is more suitable compared with the static neural network that is implemented in most of the previous work [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camarena-Martinez et al [26] used empirical mode decomposition features under variable load conditions to train static NNs, and the overall fault classifcation accuracy is 90%. At the same time, Andrijauska et al [27] and Zhang et al [28] used current and vibration signals, respectively, as fault indicators and WT as feature extraction tools to train and test diferent soft computing techniques. Meanwhile, Moloi and Yusuf [29] used continuous DWT to train GA and NN under variable speed conditions.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%