2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized relative entropy in functional magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result (q = 0.8) was identical to the conclusions of Sturzbecher et al [38] and Cabella et al [39]. Diniz et al [40] on the other hand found that q was best as 0.2 for CSF, 0.1 for white matter and 1.5 for gray matter.…”
Section: Computational Burden Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This result (q = 0.8) was identical to the conclusions of Sturzbecher et al [38] and Cabella et al [39]. Diniz et al [40] on the other hand found that q was best as 0.2 for CSF, 0.1 for white matter and 1.5 for gray matter.…”
Section: Computational Burden Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The question is now if the same method is chosen as the best one if physiological noise is incorporated in the data generation process. Therefore, in the final simulation study we compared the standard SPM analysis against an analysis method for event-related fMRI developed by Cabella et al (2009). The latter technique is based on the generalized relative entropy of the time series and uses the Kullback-Leibler divergence to distinguish between activated epochs and resting epochs (see Cabella et al, 2009 for a full description).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that by including physiological noise in the data generation process, the simulation results in terms of sensitivity and specificity drop dramatically. Additionally, we used the new proposed simulation model to compare a standard SPM analysis against the method proposed by Cabella et al (2009). The results indicate that the analysis of data containing no physiological noise yields a better performance of the SPM analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the statistical power of the proposed test, we construct its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve from the probability distribution of the fraction of remaining tumour cells for simulated experiments that evolve either to cure or non-cure. ROC curve is an important tool which has been widely used in many research areas such as radiology [13] and signal analysis [14][15][16]. In a recent study [17] ROC curves were used in prediction procedures related to prostate disease.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%