2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
557
1
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,974 publications
(651 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
557
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…First, on the relevance of the instruments, the high Shea (1997) partial-R 2 statistics (in the range of 0.08 to 0.13) indicate that both instruments strongly correlate with LFO. This is further supported by the Kleibergen and Paap (2006) Wald statistics, which mostly exceed the highest recommended critical value. Second, to test the exclusion condition, we report the Hansen (1982) J statistics, which are statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…First, on the relevance of the instruments, the high Shea (1997) partial-R 2 statistics (in the range of 0.08 to 0.13) indicate that both instruments strongly correlate with LFO. This is further supported by the Kleibergen and Paap (2006) Wald statistics, which mostly exceed the highest recommended critical value. Second, to test the exclusion condition, we report the Hansen (1982) J statistics, which are statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We estimated a first stage linear regression in which co-residence was the dependent variable and independent variables included the instruments and all control variables included in the second stage. We tested for joint significance of the instruments using the Kleibergen-Paap Wald F-statistic test (Kleibergen & Paap, 2006). The null hypothesis for this test is that the instrument is not correlated with co-residence.…”
Section: Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we discuss whether we are subject to a weak instruments problem. To test for weak instruments, we report the Kleibergen and Paap (2006) rk statistic, which is a generalization of the weak IV test to the case of non-i.i.d. errors.…”
Section: The E¤ect Of Blogs On Friendsmentioning
confidence: 99%