2017
DOI: 10.1080/10652469.2017.1393809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized rational zeta series for ζ(2n) and ζ(2n+1)

Abstract: 9) Cl 1 (θ) = − log 2 sin θ 2 , |θ| < 2π.Writing others out,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, building upon previous work from [19] we derive elementary and direct proofs for both H(a, b) (Theorem 1.1) and T (a, b) (Theorem 1.2) using the same approach with identities explored in [23]. Our proofs are significantly simpler than those given in [21,29] and rely on the Taylor series of integer powers of arcsin.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, building upon previous work from [19] we derive elementary and direct proofs for both H(a, b) (Theorem 1.1) and T (a, b) (Theorem 1.2) using the same approach with identities explored in [23]. Our proofs are significantly simpler than those given in [21,29] and rely on the Taylor series of integer powers of arcsin.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re s > 0 is the Dirichlet beta function. As we have already highlighted in [20,23], we can express the cotangent integral in terms of Clausen functions.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (6) and (8) have been used again. Note this formula is the same as in other papers as well (see [6], [15]). Again, taking more partial derivatives, we will have (23) ∂ p F ∂m p (n,0,π/2) = 2 p π/2 0 x n log p (sin(x)) dx = π 2 n π 2(n + 1)…”
Section: Lsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where ( 6) and ( 8) have been used again. Note this formula is the same as in other papers as well (see [6], [15]). Again, taking more partial derivatives, we will have…”
Section: Lsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…(2n + 2r + 2s + 3)2 2n . Now, we state the following Theorem 2.5 (Orr, [19]). For p ∈ N, and |z| < 1, πz 0…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 97%