2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized plasticity model for inelastic RCFT column response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of conventional circular CFST columns has been studied analytically and numerically by researchers [7,9,10,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Kostic et al [37] developed a concentrated plasticity beam-column model based on the generalized plasticity material model for CFST beam-columns. The axial force and bending moment interaction, gradual yielding and strain hardening of material and nonlinear geometry under large displacements were taken into account in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of conventional circular CFST columns has been studied analytically and numerically by researchers [7,9,10,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Kostic et al [37] developed a concentrated plasticity beam-column model based on the generalized plasticity material model for CFST beam-columns. The axial force and bending moment interaction, gradual yielding and strain hardening of material and nonlinear geometry under large displacements were taken into account in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why this strategy is not commonly employed in practical contexts. The second approach formulates the cross‐section yield criterion in terms of generalized stresses, that is, axial force and bending moments . This is, therefore, more useful from an engineering point of view, being theoretically able to provide synthetic results in an extremely short time, and also making it possible to afford parametric studies on the design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small iterative effort, the approach also compares well with specialized direct methods for limit analysis, with the advantage of providing the load‐displacement relationship. The geometric nonlinearity under large displacements can be accounted for by means of corotational formulations . The geometric interpretation of the Minkowski sum together with the proposed analysis procedures opens, however, new attractive possibilities to account for the strength decrease due to damage or fire exposition without the need to reconstruct the yield surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations