1980
DOI: 10.2307/2006188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized OCI Schemes for Boundary Layer Problems

Abstract: Abstract. A family of tridiagonal formally fourth-order difference schemes is developed for a class of singular perturbation problems. These schemes have no cellReynolds number limitation and satisfy a discrete maximum principle. Error estimates and numerical results for this family of methods are given, and are compared with those for several other schemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions were first proposed for the case of uniform mesh in [1]. From the conditions (3.6) and (3.7), we get …”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions were first proposed for the case of uniform mesh in [1]. From the conditions (3.6) and (3.7), we get …”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove this theorem we adopt the comparison function approach, which was employed in [14,15,16] for analysis of some difference methods for singular perturbation problems. An outline is given in [15].…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An outline is given in [15]. For our problem we choose the comparison functions ϕ(x) = 1+x and ψ(x) = exp(− λD −1 (1 − x)) for some λ > 0.…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper is concerned with finite-difference approximations, which have received their share of attention (see, for example, [7], [8], [13], [17], and [20] and references contained therein). A continuous source of analyses of various approaches to these problems is supplied by the proceedings of the BAIL conferences edited by J. J. H. Miller [22], [23], and [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%