The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
5,663
1
50

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7,078 publications
(5,892 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
24
5,663
1
50
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither was the interaction between heterozygosity and sex significant for any study year, indicating that the association between probability of local recruitment and individual genetic diversity did not differ between males and females. The random effect (pair identity) had a little impact on our models, and analyses ran excluding it yielded qualitatively similar results in terms of both model selection and the significance of the variables included (data not shown) (Bolker et al., 2009). We performed an analysis with data from all years collectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither was the interaction between heterozygosity and sex significant for any study year, indicating that the association between probability of local recruitment and individual genetic diversity did not differ between males and females. The random effect (pair identity) had a little impact on our models, and analyses ran excluding it yielded qualitatively similar results in terms of both model selection and the significance of the variables included (data not shown) (Bolker et al., 2009). We performed an analysis with data from all years collectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009). We performed our analyses in R 3.1.1 (R Core Team 2014) using the packages lme4 (Bates et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of overdispersion ( χ 2 /df = 3.41), an R‐side scale parameter was used (Bolker et al. 2009). The Tukey–Kramer adjustment was used as a post hoc test to determine whether different areas had significantly different levels of aggression from one another.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%