2018
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/7/070501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Lanczos method for systematic optimization of tensor network states

Abstract: We propose a generalized Lanczos method to generate the many-body basis states of quantum lattice models using tensor-network states (TNS). The ground-state wave function is represented as a linear superposition composed from a set of TNS generated by Lanczos iteration. This method improves significantly both the accuracy and the efficiency of the tensor-network algorithm and allows the ground state to be determined accurately using TNS with very small virtual bond dimensions. This state contains significantly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MPS [72][73][74][75] represents the quantum many-body state in a chain of D × D matrices multiplied together, whose entanglement is bounded by the bond dimension D. The MPS can provide very efficient representations for gapped quantum many-body states in 1D, due to the area-law scaling of entanglement. However for gapless states at quantum critical points, the entanglement scales logarithmically, which generally requires tensor network [76,77] with more complicated structure but more powerful expressing capability to represent the state, but the computational cost for those tensor networks will also be much higher.…”
Section: Matrix Product State and Finite Correlation Length Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPS [72][73][74][75] represents the quantum many-body state in a chain of D × D matrices multiplied together, whose entanglement is bounded by the bond dimension D. The MPS can provide very efficient representations for gapped quantum many-body states in 1D, due to the area-law scaling of entanglement. However for gapless states at quantum critical points, the entanglement scales logarithmically, which generally requires tensor network [76,77] with more complicated structure but more powerful expressing capability to represent the state, but the computational cost for those tensor networks will also be much higher.…”
Section: Matrix Product State and Finite Correlation Length Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy used in Ref. 19 is to attach a single index to the orthogonality center which labels the wavefunctions. This effectively bundles states together to make a bundled MPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tens or hundreds of excitations have been solved in the models we investigate with only a moderately large bond dimension. The advantage of directly infusing the DMRG algorithm with block Lanczos will avoid the issues with solving a generic cost function to obtain the excitations [16,17,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the Chebyshev expansion is applied twice. We first carry out a CheMPS calculation to obtain a set of Chebyshev vectors represented using MPS, and then reorthonormalize these MPS to obtain a set of many-body basis states 25 . Within the truncated Hilbert space spanned by this set of basis states, we re-diagonalize the Hamiltonian and evaluate the spectral function, using the Chebyshev expansion again.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%