2007
DOI: 10.11650/twjm/1500404872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GENERALIZED JORDAN TRIPLE $(\theta,\phi)$-DERIVATIONS ON SEMIPRIME RINGS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of generalized derivation has been introduced by Bresar [4]. Hvala [11] and Lee [18] introduced a concept of (θ, φ)-derivation (see also [19]). An additive mapping…”
Section: Since Then the Stability Problems Of Various Functional Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of generalized derivation has been introduced by Bresar [4]. Hvala [11] and Lee [18] introduced a concept of (θ, φ)-derivation (see also [19]). An additive mapping…”
Section: Since Then the Stability Problems Of Various Functional Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additive mapping ξ : R → R is called a generalized (θ, ϕ)-derivation if there exists a (θ, ϕ)-derivation δ : R → R such that ξ(xy) = ξ(x)θ(y) + ϕ(x)δ(y) holds for all x, y ∈ R (see [6], [11]). In [13], Liu and Shiue proved that every Jordan (triple) (θ, ϕ)-derivation on a 2-torsion free semiprime ring is a (θ, ϕ)-derivation. Also, they introduced a concept of generalized Jordan (θ, ϕ)-derivation and generalized Jordan triple (θ, ϕ)-derivation (see also [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A result of [1] states that every generalized Jordan (θ, ϕ)-derivation is a generalized Jordan triple (θ, ϕ)-derivation. Liu and Shiue [13] proved that every generalized Jordan (triple) (θ, ϕ)-derivation on a 2-torsion free semiprime ring is a generalized (θ, ϕ)-derivation (see also [14]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus [xp, y] = 0 for all x, y ∈ R. Then we have [x, y] zp = 0 for all x, y, z ∈ R. It follows that R is commutative or p = 0. If p = 0, then λ(x) = 0 for all x ∈ R by (12). If [x, y] = 0, then from (12) follows that λ(x)y − λ(y)x = 0 for all x, y ∈ R. Consequently λ = 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If p = 0, then λ(x) = 0 for all x ∈ R by (12). If [x, y] = 0, then from (12) follows that λ(x)y − λ(y)x = 0 for all x, y ∈ R. Consequently λ = 0. Now suppose that R is a PI ring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%