2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2015.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized inverses of a factorization in a ring with involution

Abstract: Let R be a ring with an involution * and p, a, q ∈ R. In this paper, we investigate the necessary and sufficient conditions for paq to have a {1, 3}-inverse (respectively, {1, 4}-inverse). In particular, the equivalences for the existence of the MoorePenrose inverse of paq are obtained. As applications, the existence and expression of the Moore-Penrose inverse of a (2, 2, 0) matrix over R are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Similar to generalized inverses of matrices, algebraists have defined Moore–Penrose inverses of elements in other general algebraic frameworks, such as, semigroups, rings, operator algebras, Hilbert -modules (cf. [18] , [20] , [22] , [29] , [32] , [39] , [44] , [47] , [60] , [72] , [125] ). Without loss of generality, assume that the algebraic system is assumed to be a -algebra .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Similar to generalized inverses of matrices, algebraists have defined Moore–Penrose inverses of elements in other general algebraic frameworks, such as, semigroups, rings, operator algebras, Hilbert -modules (cf. [18] , [20] , [22] , [29] , [32] , [39] , [44] , [47] , [60] , [72] , [125] ). Without loss of generality, assume that the algebraic system is assumed to be a -algebra .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof If a = aa * ax, then (ax) * is a {1, 4}-inverse of a according to [8,Lemma 2.2]. By the proof (ii)⇔(iii) in Theorem 2.16, it is known that a = (ax * x * a * a)a * a, and (ax * x * a * a) * is a {1, 3}-inverse of a.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By [19,Lemma 2.2], we know that a is {1,3}-invertible and that u −1 is a {1,3}-inverse of a. Multiplying a = p+u by a * on the right gives aa * = ua * and hence a = aa * (u −1 ) * . Again, from [19,Lemma 2.2], it follows that a is {1,4}-invertible and that u −1 is a {1,4}-inverse of a. Thus, a ∈ R † and a † = a (1,4) aa (1,3)…”
Section: The Moore-penrose Inverse Of An Element and Its * -Cleannessmentioning
confidence: 99%