1984
DOI: 10.2307/1911486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
867
3
13

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,102 publications
(902 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
867
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this problem, we shall use an alternative approach, based on Hansen's (1982) generalized method of moments This provides a means of estimating parameters in a model by matching theoretical moments of the data, as functions of the parameters being estimated, to their sample counterparts. For a full description, see Hansen (1982) or Hansen and Singleton (1982).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Prepayment Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this problem, we shall use an alternative approach, based on Hansen's (1982) generalized method of moments This provides a means of estimating parameters in a model by matching theoretical moments of the data, as functions of the parameters being estimated, to their sample counterparts. For a full description, see Hansen (1982) or Hansen and Singleton (1982).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Prepayment Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work differs because we use this framework to study cross-sectional returns rather than investment dynamics or financing constraints. Most important, our q-theory approach to understanding cross-sectional returns represents a fundamental departure from the traditional consumption-based approach (e.g., Hansen and Singleton 1982;Lettau and Ludvigson 2001) in that we do not make any preference assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the model's violation is due to liquidity constraints or to precautionary saving, excess sensitivity is more likely to arise in the younger and older age groups (Jappelli, 1990;Gourinchas and Parker, 2002). On the other hand, the sample 12 See Hansen and Singleton (1982), and for the properties of the IV estimators when the instruments are weakly correlated with the endogenous variable. 13 The group aged between 61 and 64 was excluded to prevent transitions into retirement from distorting the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the sample did not show a high degree of correlation between age and unemployment transitions. 15 See Hansen and Singleton (1982), and for the properties of the IV estimators when the instruments are weakly correlated with the endogenous variable. 16 The group aged between 61 and 64 was excluded to prevent transitions into retirement from distorting the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%