“…Theorem 5.1 Suppose that assumption (H 1 ) and (H 2 ) hold. Then there exists a δ 0 > 0, which depends on k i , λ 1 , λ 2 , T , for i = 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 such that when k 2 , k 3 , k 9 , 4,5,6,7,8,11,12 and is independent of T , such that when k 2 , k 3 , k 9 , k 10 ∈ [0, δ 1 ), there exists a unique adapted solution (X, Y, Z) to MF-FBSDE (29). Remark 5.1), by repeating the above discussion, one can show that if 2(λ 1 + λ 2 ) < −2 k 1 − k 2 6 − k 2 7 − k 2 8 , there exists a δ 1 > 0, which depends on k 1 , k i , λ 1 , λ 2 , for i = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 and is independent of T , such that when k 2 , k 3 , k 9 , k 10 ∈ [0, δ 1 ), there exists a unique adapted solution (X, Y, Z) to MF-FBSDE (29).…”