2010
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/32/325301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Grassmannian coherent states for pseudo-Hermitiann-level systems

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to generalize fermionic coherent states for two-level systems described by pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian [1], to n-level systems. Central to this task is the expression of the coherent states in terms of generalized Grassmann variables.These kind of Grassmann coherent states satisfy bi-overcompleteness condition instead of over-completeness one, as it is reasonably expected because of the biorthonormality of the system. Choosing an appropriate Grassmann weight function resolution of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[12]. Different kind of (nonnormalized) para-Grassmann 'left' CS for finite level pseudo-Hermitian systems are considered in [14,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12]. Different kind of (nonnormalized) para-Grassmann 'left' CS for finite level pseudo-Hermitian systems are considered in [14,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the scheme developed in section 3 (and in [16] for Hermitian case) one can construct bi-overcomplete 'left' and 'right' ladder operator eigenstates for a(n; ρ) and b † (n; ρ) using the para-Grassmann algebra (7) and the integration rules (13). Bi-overcomplete sets of para-Grassmann 'left' (nonnormalized) eigenstates of a(n; ρ) and b † (n; ρ) were constructed in [14] using different paragrassmannian variables and integration rules. In [15] overcomplete families of eigenstates of a ′ = q N/2 a(n; ρ (q) ) (where, in our notations, [[N ]] = b(n; ρ (q) )a(n; ρ (q) )) and c ′ = q N ′ /2 b † (n; ρ (q) ) (where [[N ′ ]] = a † (n; ρ (q) ) b † (n; ρ (q) ) are built up using also different paragrassmannian variables and integration rules.…”
Section: N-pf and Non-hermitian Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We not that in [25] the creation operator b ♯ is η-pseudo-Hermitian adjoint of the annihilation operator b, but our changed ladder operatorb is not η-pseudo-Hermitian adjoint of b, and we have b ♯ =bq −N . One could easily check that the pseudo-Hermitian number states can be expressed in terms of b andb (also c andc for the dual space), and these operators annihilate and create the number states as follows…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We say that the three operators A(n), A † (n) and N , satisfying (1) and (14) form the nfermion algebra. At n = 1 it coincides with the (standard) fermion algebra.…”
Section: Nonlinear Fermion Algebra and Fock Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%