2003
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.810408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized finite-element method for magnetized nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a great deal of effort has been put into the development of numerical methods in order to tackle metallic nanostructures. Some representative methods are the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) [19], the Multiple Multipole methods (MMP) [20], and other more general electromagnetic field solvers like the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) [21] and the Finite Element Methods (FEM) [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a great deal of effort has been put into the development of numerical methods in order to tackle metallic nanostructures. Some representative methods are the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) [19], the Multiple Multipole methods (MMP) [20], and other more general electromagnetic field solvers like the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) [21] and the Finite Element Methods (FEM) [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babuška et al [5] apply GFEM (still at the early stages of development in 1994) to problems with material interfaces. Plaks et al [90] implemented GFEM for problems with magnetized particles. The main advantage of GFEM is that the approximating functions can in principle be arbitrary and are certainly not limited to polynomials.…”
Section: Generalized Fem By Partition Of Unitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of gradients and implementation of the Dirichlet conditions also get more complicated. In addition, GFEM-PU may lead to a combinatorial increase in the number of degrees of freedom [90,110]. An even greater difficulty in GFEM-PU is the high cost of the Galerkin quadratures that need to be computed numerically in geometrically complex 3D regions (intersections of overlapping patches).…”
Section: Generalized Fem By Partition Of Unitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neste trabalho o Método de Elementos Finitos Generalizado (MEFG), com o auxílio da funções de ondas planas, que são utilizadas para enriquecer as funções de forma do tracional Método de Elemento Finito (MEF), será utilizado para resolver a equação de Helmholtz [1,6,7]. Utilizando as funções de ondas planas, que são soluções analíticas da Equação de Helmholtz para enriquecer a Partição da Unidade (PU) do MEF e uma malha 2 com resolução maior que um comprimento de onda, o MEFG apresenta resultados com uma boa precisão numérica, quando aplicado a problemas de propagação e espalhamento de ondas [2].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified