2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0499-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Estimating Equations

Abstract: tion with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test whether this response rate varied between noise and quiet treatments, and in relation to time without food, we used generalized estimating equations [14]. We first analysed responses to the parental stimuli, using a model that included stimulus (parent-with-call, parent-without-call), treatment (noise, quiet), deprivation period (shorter, longer) and their interaction as main effects, and trial (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test whether this response rate varied between noise and quiet treatments, and in relation to time without food, we used generalized estimating equations [14]. We first analysed responses to the parental stimuli, using a model that included stimulus (parent-with-call, parent-without-call), treatment (noise, quiet), deprivation period (shorter, longer) and their interaction as main effects, and trial (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probabilities calculated are the proportions of 1s from each participant for each swallowing task by each physiological component. We estimated the probability that each swallowing task yielded the OI score using generalized estimating equations with a logit link function and the binary indicator variable as the outcome variable (Ziegler & Vens, 2010). We also calculated the range (maximum minus minimum) of probabilities across swallowing tasks for each physiological component to discern whether one swallowing task had sufficiently higher probability of yielding the worst performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, marginal models are quite rarely employed within the behavioural sciences, despite the fact that Generalized estimating equations, i.e. the marginal modelling approach (Lee & Nelder, 2004;Ziegler, 2011), can handle correlated non-normally distributed (and heteroscedastic) data, which are, in fact, very common in the behavioural sciences. GEE is relatively easy to use.…”
Section: Analysis Of Non-normal Correlated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%