2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3084330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Disappointment Aversion, Learning, and Asset Prices

Abstract: ISBN 978-80-7343-413-7 (Univerzita Karlova, Centrum pro ekonomický výzkum a doktorské studium) ISBN 978-80-7344-449-5 (Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.) AbstractThis paper provides a generalized disappointment aversion (GDA) interpretation of the variance and skew risk premia in equity returns and the volatility skew in equity index options. The key ingredients are Bayesian learning about a hidden consumption growth rate and the investor's tail aversion induced by GDA preferences which amplify the impac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, models with utility functions featuring the disappointment aversion of Gul (2010) (e.g. Campanale, Castro, & Clementi, 2010), or the generalized disappointment aversion of Routledge and Zin (2010) (such as, Andries, 2019; Babiak, 2019) or the semi‐weighted utility model of Epstein and Zin (2001) are well known to be able to match several features of asset returns such as the high equity premium, low risk‐free rate, return predictability, variance, skewness risk premia in equity returns, and the downward sloping term‐structure of Sharpe ratios. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic studies of the performances of these models in an international framework.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, models with utility functions featuring the disappointment aversion of Gul (2010) (e.g. Campanale, Castro, & Clementi, 2010), or the generalized disappointment aversion of Routledge and Zin (2010) (such as, Andries, 2019; Babiak, 2019) or the semi‐weighted utility model of Epstein and Zin (2001) are well known to be able to match several features of asset returns such as the high equity premium, low risk‐free rate, return predictability, variance, skewness risk premia in equity returns, and the downward sloping term‐structure of Sharpe ratios. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic studies of the performances of these models in an international framework.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%