1979
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
1,576
0
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,050 publications
(1,606 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
1,576
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the Generalized Cross-Validation method (GCV) (Golub et al, 1979) could be extended to estimate several regularization parameters. However, contrary to the ReML approach, the GCV method does not provide any estimate of (multiple) noise components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Generalized Cross-Validation method (GCV) (Golub et al, 1979) could be extended to estimate several regularization parameters. However, contrary to the ReML approach, the GCV method does not provide any estimate of (multiple) noise components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common approach is for example L-curve method (LCM) proposed by Hansen [13] and applied for instance in [14]. Another well-known scheme can be general cross validation method (GCV) introduced in [15]. However, for nonlinear inverse problems rigorous procedures to determine the optimal value of the regularization parameter are rarely available [16].…”
Section: Iteratively Regularized Gauss-newton Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second point is the appropriate choice of parameters for reconstruction and the regularization, i.e., K and a. Some methods were reported concerning the choice of a for the case that data include noise with an unknown norm [Golub et al, 1979], and the consideration will be important in the future work.…”
Section: Application To Measured Datamentioning
confidence: 99%