2015
DOI: 10.3329/dujs.v62i1.21956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Composite Numerical Integration Rule Over a Polygon Using Gaussian Quadrature

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to evaluate double integrals over a polygon exploiting coordinate transformation. At first any polygon with m-sides is decomposed into triangles. Then each triangle is transformed into a standard triangular finite element using the basis functions in local space. Then the standard triangle is decomposed into right isosceles triangles with side lengths , and thus composite numerical integration is employed. In addition, the affine transformation over each decomposed triangle and the use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can see that expression (31) decays as t → ∞ for any fixed p, provided that θ → ∞. This condition for approaching to Gaussianity is equivalent to the respective condition for the PDF solution, (27).…”
Section: Wave Turbulence Description Beyond the Spectrummentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can see that expression (31) decays as t → ∞ for any fixed p, provided that θ → ∞. This condition for approaching to Gaussianity is equivalent to the respective condition for the PDF solution, (27).…”
Section: Wave Turbulence Description Beyond the Spectrummentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At present, we do not have an explanation for this behaviour. the reference square [−1, 1] 2 (see [27] for the additional details), and tensor products of the modified Clenshaw-Curtis formulas are used to compute the integrals. It should be noted that, in contrast to the formulation considered in [6], here we have a bounded domain of integration, which somewhat simplifies the problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%