2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08412-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized ComBat harmonization methods for radiomic features with multi-modal distributions and multiple batch effects

Abstract: Radiomic features have a wide range of clinical applications, but variability due to image acquisition factors can affect their performance. The harmonization tool ComBat is a promising solution but is limited by inability to harmonize multimodal distributions, unknown imaging parameters, and multiple imaging parameters. In this study, we propose two methods for addressing these limitations. We propose a sequential method that allows for harmonization of radiomic features by multiple imaging parameters (Nested… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were also unable to collect some data for a complete statistical survey. Also, if the original data can be retrieved from different institutes, ComBat harmonization methods 52 can be employed to harmonize the radiomics features of our data. Moreover, imbalanced data also occurred in our dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were also unable to collect some data for a complete statistical survey. Also, if the original data can be retrieved from different institutes, ComBat harmonization methods 52 can be employed to harmonize the radiomics features of our data. Moreover, imbalanced data also occurred in our dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as a further development, matRadiomics will be improved by adding new automatic and semi-automatic segmentation algorithms, as already reported above [ 24 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], support for more file formats (e.g., NIfTi) [ 38 ], more advanced harmonization methods [ 39 ], and co-registration of multi-modal images [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome possible biases related to the use of two different scanners we utilized the ComBat approach( Johnson et al, 2007 ) for harmonization of the DTI data. Harmonization tries to control for “batch effects” of data taken using different equipment or at different locations and times and this specific method works by utilizing the Empirical Bayes method to better estimate parameters of location and scale( Eshaghzadeh Torbati et al, 2021 ; Horng et al, 2022 ; Johnson et al, 2007 ). The ComBat model was reconfigured for DTI analysis and has proved to be the most efficient approach for adjusting for inter-scanner and site variability in DTI scans compared to other harmonization techniques ( Fortin et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%