2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized buckling analysis of laminated plates with random material properties using stochastic finite elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is nowadays generally recognized that an accurate prediction of the buckling behavior of shells requires a realistic description of all uncertainties involved in the problem and that such task is realizable only in the framework of a robust Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) formulation that can efficiently and accurately handle geometric as well as physical nonlinearities of shell-type structures (Choi and Noh, 2000;Graham and Siragy, 2001;Argyris et al, 2002b;Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005;Stefanou and Papadrakakis, 2004;Lagaros and Papadopoulos, 2006;Noh, 2006;Onkar et al, 2006;Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007). The analysis of such structures has been carried out in a probabilistic context through the application of the Finite Element method in conjunction with the Monte Carlo Simulation, incorporating realistic descriptions of the uncertainties involved in geometric (Bielewicz and Górski, 2002;Schenk and Schuëller, 2003), material and thickness imperfections Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005), as well as boundary conditions (Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007;Schenk and Schuëller, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is nowadays generally recognized that an accurate prediction of the buckling behavior of shells requires a realistic description of all uncertainties involved in the problem and that such task is realizable only in the framework of a robust Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) formulation that can efficiently and accurately handle geometric as well as physical nonlinearities of shell-type structures (Choi and Noh, 2000;Graham and Siragy, 2001;Argyris et al, 2002b;Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005;Stefanou and Papadrakakis, 2004;Lagaros and Papadopoulos, 2006;Noh, 2006;Onkar et al, 2006;Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007). The analysis of such structures has been carried out in a probabilistic context through the application of the Finite Element method in conjunction with the Monte Carlo Simulation, incorporating realistic descriptions of the uncertainties involved in geometric (Bielewicz and Górski, 2002;Schenk and Schuëller, 2003), material and thickness imperfections Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005), as well as boundary conditions (Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007;Schenk and Schuëller, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Najafizadeh and Eslami [151] used classical plate theory (CLPT) to investigate the buckling behavior of clamped and simply supported circular FGM plate. Onkar et al [152,153] presented the generalized buckling of laminated composite plate with random material properties using classical plate theory (CLPT) combined with First order shear deformation theory (FSDT). Samsamshariat et al [154] studied buckling behavior of FGM plates under uniaxial compression and biaxial compression and tension, using CLPT and HSDT.…”
Section: Bending and Stability Analysis Of Fg Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 22 is the nonlinear free vibration problem which is random in nature, being dependent on the system properties. Consequently, the nonlinear natural frequency (ω nl ) and its mode shape are random in nature.…”
Section: Governing Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MCS approach, the samples are generated using Mat Lab to fit the desired mean and SD. These samples are used in response equation (22), which is solved repeatedly, adopting conventional eigenvalue procedure, to generate a sample of the nonlinear fundamental frequency. The number of samples used for MCS approach is 10,000 based on satisfactory convergence of the results.…”
Section: Standard Deviation Of Nonlinear Fundamental Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation