2018
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Bootstrap Supports for Phylogenetic Analyses of Protein Sequences Incorporating Alignment Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amino acid and nucleotide data were aligned using Fast Statistical Alignment (FSA v1.15.9; Bradley et al, 2009) with the default settings for peptide and the setting “–noanchored” for nucleotide. FSA has been shown to be one of the top-performing alignment programs (Bradley et al, 2009; Redelings, 2014), and does not rely upon a guide tree for sequence alignment, alleviating downstream bias (Bradley et al, 2009; Boyce, Sievers & Higgins, 2015; Chatzou et al, 2018). A maximum likelihood (ML) tree was then inferred for each gene using RAxMLv.8.2.4 (Stamatakis, 2014), with the PROTGAMMAAUTO and GTR+G models of evolution used for the amino acid and nucleotide data, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid and nucleotide data were aligned using Fast Statistical Alignment (FSA v1.15.9; Bradley et al, 2009) with the default settings for peptide and the setting “–noanchored” for nucleotide. FSA has been shown to be one of the top-performing alignment programs (Bradley et al, 2009; Redelings, 2014), and does not rely upon a guide tree for sequence alignment, alleviating downstream bias (Bradley et al, 2009; Boyce, Sievers & Higgins, 2015; Chatzou et al, 2018). A maximum likelihood (ML) tree was then inferred for each gene using RAxMLv.8.2.4 (Stamatakis, 2014), with the PROTGAMMAAUTO and GTR+G models of evolution used for the amino acid and nucleotide data, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives include other non-parametric resampling methods such as the jackknife (Tukey, 1958) and parametric resampling (Warnow, 2017;Felsenstein, 2004). Examples of the latter include MSA-specific confidence measures such as GUIDANCE1 (Landan and Graur, 2008;Penn et al, 2010), GUIDANCE2 (Sela et al, 2015), PSAR (Kim and Ma, 2011), T-COFFEE (Notredame et al, 2000), wpSBOOT (Chang et al, 2019), and Divvier (Ali et al, 2019) and parametric and/or specialpurpose MSA resampling or filtering techniques applied to the problem of phylogenetic support estimation, including TCS (Chang et al, 2014), the unistrap (Chatzou et al, 2018), Gblocks (Talavera and Castresana, 2007), Trimal (Capella-Gutiérrez et al, 2009), and the method of Rajan (2013). Both classes of alternative methods are less popular than the bootstrap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of these sequence errors in downstream analyses is not yet fully understood, but it is reasonable to assume that they will adversely affect phylogenetic analyses. Persistence of non-homologous sequence stretches will negatively affect the quality of MSA, which is known to impact phylogenetic accuracy [1]. The non-homologous sequence itself might also cause problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%