2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2019)066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized asymptotics for gauge fields

Abstract: An interesting question is to characterize the general class of allowed boundary conditions for gauge theories, including gravity, at spatial and null infinity. This has played a role in discussions of soft charges, where antipodal symmetry has typically been assumed. However, the existence of electric and gravitational line operators, arising from gauge-invariant dressed observables, for example associated to axial or Fefferman-Graham like gauges, indicates the existence of non-antipodally symmetric initial d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between two distinct such field configurations, satisfying (9), is a pure radiation (sourceless) field. So, for example, the gravitational line dressing (8), which may also be put in this form, creates a field configuration that, in the case of a fixed static source, is expected to emit radiation to infinity and asymptote to the symmetrical Coulomb-like solution in the future [8], in parallel with the decay of the analogous electromagnetic Faraday line [25][26][27][28]. Thus, in general, different dressings correspond to different radiation fields superposed on a given dressing, and for example have different soft charges [10].…”
Section: Gravitational Dressings: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between two distinct such field configurations, satisfying (9), is a pure radiation (sourceless) field. So, for example, the gravitational line dressing (8), which may also be put in this form, creates a field configuration that, in the case of a fixed static source, is expected to emit radiation to infinity and asymptote to the symmetrical Coulomb-like solution in the future [8], in parallel with the decay of the analogous electromagnetic Faraday line [25][26][27][28]. Thus, in general, different dressings correspond to different radiation fields superposed on a given dressing, and for example have different soft charges [10].…”
Section: Gravitational Dressings: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also of the general form (31), with anĚ i corresponding to a Coulomb field. The corresponding 6 For previous discussions of EM dressings, see [31][32][33][34] and [28]. 7 A related construction given by Mandelstam [35] is to run such a line back in time to a fiducial time, and then to infinity in the corresponding spatial slice, rather than running the line to infinity at equal time to the original operator.…”
Section: A General Dressingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both electric and magnetic dressings are necessary in the presence of magnetic poles [31]. Most dressings are JHEP06(2020)081 usually chosen not to fulfill any particular parity conditions [32,33], leading to divergences in the boost generators, which must be regulated. Given the ambiguity in the dressing of physical states, one might consider dressings that fulfill our (twisted) parity conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also discuss how the AdS d isometry charges act on our soft mode phase space. In section 7, we show how our results on AdS d and those studied in the literature for Maxwell theory on flat space [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] could be related to each other through an AdS (large radius) flat space limit. In particular, we show that only the source boundary gauge transformations and the associated soft charges survive the limit and the response charges become subdominant and do not appear in the limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%