2006
DOI: 10.1007/11889205_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Arc Consistency for Positive Table Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof It was shown in [16] that an optimal SAC transformation can be found, for any VCSP, by first propagating infinite costs using a standard generalized arc consistency algorithm [40,43] and then by solving a linear program. (A more detailed description of this algorithm is given below).…”
Section: Sfm Via Linear Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof It was shown in [16] that an optimal SAC transformation can be found, for any VCSP, by first propagating infinite costs using a standard generalized arc consistency algorithm [40,43] and then by solving a linear program. (A more detailed description of this algorithm is given below).…”
Section: Sfm Via Linear Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessarily converges since each cost φ σ (x) can be increased to ∞ at most once. In fact, the propagation of infinite costs by SAC operations in the VCSP P = V, D, C can be achieved by establishing generalized arc consistency [43] in the feasibility CSP Feas(P) = V, D, { σ, Feas(φ) : σ, φ ∈ C} , a standard operation in Constraint Programming for which efficient algorithms have been developed [40]. Alternatively, the constraints of Feas(P) can be decomposed into their binary projections and a standard arc consistency algorithm applied [1].…”
Section: Sfm Via Linear Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, achieving generalised arc consistency (GAC) [4,15,16] on the reformulation is not equivalent to achieving GAC on the original constraint. Arc-consistency is preserved only in the case of dependencies between pairs of variables.…”
Section: Definition 4 (Minimal Reformulation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,1,12,6]. For each variable value pair (x, a), the index data structure has an array of the indexes of the tuples with value a for x.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next data structure is semantically equivalent to the index of [12]. More formally, for a given table constraint c, FS and next satisfy the following invariant (called FS-invariant) before dequeuing an element from Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%