2012
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized and weighted Strichartz estimates

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the relations between different kinds of Strichartz estimates and give new estimates in Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^n$. In particular, we prove the generalized and weighted Strichartz estimates for a large class of dispersive operators including the Schr\"odinger and wave equation. As a sample application of these new estimates, we are able to prove the Strauss conjecture with low regularity for dimension 2 and 3.Comment: Final version, to appear in the Communications on Pure and Appl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(See also page 176 of [31], Section 5 of [25], and [9], [30], and [6] for related results.) We also mention that it was also observed for the wave equation with a power-type nonlinear term ✷u = F (u), first by Lindbald and Sogge [23], and then by some authors (see [4], [12], [3]), and quasilinear wave equations of the form ∂ 2 t u − a 2 (u)∆u = c 1 (∂ t u) 2 + c 2 |∇u| 2 , by [7] and [41]. In particular, the almost global existence of low regularity radially symmetric solutions with small initial data was showed in [9] and [7] for the semilinear and the quasilinear case in 3-D, respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…(See also page 176 of [31], Section 5 of [25], and [9], [30], and [6] for related results.) We also mention that it was also observed for the wave equation with a power-type nonlinear term ✷u = F (u), first by Lindbald and Sogge [23], and then by some authors (see [4], [12], [3]), and quasilinear wave equations of the form ∂ 2 t u − a 2 (u)∆u = c 1 (∂ t u) 2 + c 2 |∇u| 2 , by [7] and [41]. In particular, the almost global existence of low regularity radially symmetric solutions with small initial data was showed in [9] and [7] for the semilinear and the quasilinear case in 3-D, respectively.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is not difficult to find that the lower bound of the lifespan of the critical problem of (1.2) is closely related to the power q of L q t in time norm for the forcing term in the key estimates. For example, the obtained bound exp cε −qc(qc−1) which comes from [14] coincides with q = q c in estimates (3.1), and the obtained bound exp cε −(qc−1) 2 /2 which comes from [11] coincides with q = (q c − 1)/2 in estimates (3.2). In order to improve the result from [9], we adapt these generalized Strichartz estimates to the equation (1.1), use energy inequality with Klainerman-Sobolev inequality to deal with derivative term.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Then there exists a constant C, such that ∀ T < T * (3.1) [11]). When n = 2, suppose u solves the linear equation…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was known that (1.8) allows a wider range of indices (q, p) than (1.2). For the wave equation a = 1 and d ≥ 2, the optimal range of (q, p) for (1.8) is (see [9] and references therein, [17] for d = 2): (q, p) = (∞, 2) or…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%