2006
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-06-03906-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Ahlfors functions

Abstract: Abstract. Let Σ be a bordered Riemann surface with genus g and m boundary components. Let {γ z } z∈∂Σ be a smooth family of smooth Jordan curves in C which all contain the point 0 in their interior. Let p ∈ Σ and let F be the family of all bounded holomorphic functions f on Σ such that f (p) ≥ 0 and f (z) ∈ γ z for almost every z ∈ ∂Σ. Then there exists a smooth up to the boundary holomorphic function f 0 ∈ F with at most 2g + m − 1 zeros on Σ so that f 0 (z) ∈ γ z for every z ∈ ∂Σ and such that f 0 (p) ≥ f (p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, let {φ 1 , .., φ n } be a set of real valued C 3 harmonic functions in M 0 such that M j (φ k ) = δ jk . Such harmonic functions exist due to equation (3.1) of [4] which states that the period matrix is invertible. Then given a real valued harmonic function φ, we consider small perturbations φ ′ := φ + n j=1 ǫ j φ j of φ.…”
Section: Is the Restriction Of An Anti-holomorphic Function If And On...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, let {φ 1 , .., φ n } be a set of real valued C 3 harmonic functions in M 0 such that M j (φ k ) = δ jk . Such harmonic functions exist due to equation (3.1) of [4] which states that the period matrix is invertible. Then given a real valued harmonic function φ, we consider small perturbations φ ′ := φ + n j=1 ǫ j φ j of φ.…”
Section: Is the Restriction Of An Anti-holomorphic Function If And On...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, it was shown by Černe [5,Corollary 1.4] that every finitely bordered planar domain with smooth boundary embeds properly holomorphically and smoothly up to the boundary in any smoothly bounded convex domain in C n for n ≥ 2. The technique developed in his paper (see also the sequel [6] by Černe and Flores) is the basis for our construction in the present paper. It uses solutions to certain Riemann-Hilbert boundary value problems on M , similarly to what was done by the author in [23] and used in [28] in the special case when M is the disc ∆.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004 it was shown by Černe [5,Corollary 1.4] that every finitely bordered planar domain with smooth boundary embeds properly holomorphically and smoothly up to the boundary in any smoothly bounded convex domain in C n for n ≥ 2. The technique developed in his paper (see also the sequel [6] by Černe and Flores) is the basis for our construction in the present paper. It uses solutions to certain Riemann-Hilbert boundary value problems on M , similarly to what was done by the author in [21] and used in [26] in the special case when M is the disc ∆.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%