2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized additive and fuzzy models in environmental flow assessment: A comparison employing the West Balkan trout (Salmo farioides; Karaman, 1938)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported for small and medium trout in literature (Ayllon et al, 2009;Bovee, 1978). Decrease in adult fish finding probability by increase in substrate index is in contrast with previous studies on trout species (Ayllon et al, 2009;Bovee, 1978;Munoz-Mas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Turkish Journal Of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencescontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been reported for small and medium trout in literature (Ayllon et al, 2009;Bovee, 1978). Decrease in adult fish finding probability by increase in substrate index is in contrast with previous studies on trout species (Ayllon et al, 2009;Bovee, 1978;Munoz-Mas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Turkish Journal Of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Munoz-Mas et al (2016) study results on Salmo farioides showed that the large fish prefer low velocity and deep parts. The pool sections of the river are where the large fish could be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, advancements in statistical methods have promoted the development of SDMs, and numerous statistical methods and software programs have been developed to describe the niche characteristics of species and predict species distribution patterns. The popular algorithms are as follows: surface range envelope (SRE, i.e., BIOCLIM) (Booth, Nix, Busby, & Hutchinson, 2014), flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) (Basile et al, 2016), generalized linear model (GLM) (Lopatin, Dolos, Hernández, Galleguillos, & Fassnacht, 2016), generalized additive model (GAM) (Muñoz-Mas, Papadaki, Martinez-Capel, Zogaris, & Ntoanidis, 2016), multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS) (Friedman, 1991), generalized boosting model (GBM) (Moisen et al, 2006), classification tree analysis (CTA) (Thuiller & Lavorel, 2010), artificial neural network (ANN) (Segurado & Araujo, 2004), random forest (RF) (Mi, Huettmann, Guo, Han, & Wen, 2017), and maximum entropy (MaxEnt) (Phillips, Anderson, & Schapire, 2006). However, differential niche requirements of species shape the geographic distribution of species within an environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial networks have been analogously used to infer the most relevant variables to discriminate riparian from terrestrial forest (Blackard & Dean, 1999), whereas generalized linear models (Nelder & Wedderburn, 1972) have been used to infer the general topographic patterns that determine riparian forest distribution (Shoutis, Patten, & McGlynn, 2010). Finally, fuzzy-logic-based methods (Zadeh, 1965) have been profusely applied due to their capability to consider expert knowledge (Muñoz-Mas, Papadaki, et al, 2016). Consequently, fuzzy logic has been used to mathematize the stress tolerance of several lowland riparian woody species across Europe, demonstrating their disparate ecological requirements (Glenz et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%