1995
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(94)00576-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalization of the Lorenz-Haken model to atomic systems with different relaxation rates for the two laser levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond this interval, both C and B remain positive, leading to (47) having no physically meaningful solution, resulting in m being equal to zero. It can be demonstrated that within the interval p 1 < p < p 2 , the solution m ≠ 0 is stable, while for values of p below p 1 and above p 2 , the solution of m = 0 will be stable [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. This corresponds to the lasing regime, where p 1 can be identified as the lasing threshold.…”
Section: Ammentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beyond this interval, both C and B remain positive, leading to (47) having no physically meaningful solution, resulting in m being equal to zero. It can be demonstrated that within the interval p 1 < p < p 2 , the solution m ≠ 0 is stable, while for values of p below p 1 and above p 2 , the solution of m = 0 will be stable [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. This corresponds to the lasing regime, where p 1 can be identified as the lasing threshold.…”
Section: Ammentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These factors in general lead to different laser dynamics. [4] Saturable absorbers and added degrees of freedom such as pumps, resonator loss, and resonator frequency modulations [3,5,6] all have strong effects on laser dynamics. Feedback has long been used in laser design to generate high quality of laser light and chaotic lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%