1994
DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(94)90166-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalization of split Hopkinson bar technique to use viscoelastic bars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PMMA bars have been used in previous SHPB studies (e.g. [26,27]); in these investigations the strain signals were large (about 1%) and viscoelastic wave theory was found to be necessary. In the present study the maximum strain in the PMMA transmitter bar was approximately 0.05%, and viscoelastic e!ects were shown to be negligible by the following preliminary test.…”
Section: Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMMA bars have been used in previous SHPB studies (e.g. [26,27]); in these investigations the strain signals were large (about 1%) and viscoelastic wave theory was found to be necessary. In the present study the maximum strain in the PMMA transmitter bar was approximately 0.05%, and viscoelastic e!ects were shown to be negligible by the following preliminary test.…”
Section: Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…titanium, magnesium alloy or aluminum, or a polymer, e.g. polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), PC, or nylon [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88]. Low impedance metallic bars do not require any changes to the experimental apparatus or data reduction.…”
Section: Dynamic Loading: Split Hopkinson Pressure Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rubbers were some of the first materials to be characterized in split Hopkinson bar experiments [1,2], and more recently a number of authors have proposed techniques to address these difficulties through modifications to the Hopkinson bar or other similar systems [57,66]. These include pulse shaping [62], low impedance Hopkinson bar materials to increase the transmitted force [76,77,81,82,148] or use of more sensitive force gauges to directly measure the force at the specimen bar interface [62][63][64]. Longer Hopkinson bars may be used to increase the duration of the experiment [53], as can direct impact systems [149], in addition, if stress gauges are combined with optical measurements of specimen deformation, the experiment duration is no longer limited by wave overlapping in the bars and longer durations can be achieved [150].…”
Section: Rubbery Amorphous Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An SHPB set-up made of viscoelastic bars was implemented in order to cover the impedance mismatch disadvantage of soft specimens; however, the nature of viscoelasticity of the bar materials resulted in intensified wave dispersion and attenuation effects [8,9]. The use of hollow SHPB transmitter bars was also investigated but it did not affect the amplitude of the noise [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%