2017
DOI: 10.1119/1.4994835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalization of parallel axis theorem for rotational inertia

Abstract: This paper discusses two levels of generalization of the parallel axis theorem for rotational inertia. The first relates the moments of inertia about any two parallel axes, whether or not they are passing through the center of mass. The second relates the inertia tensors about any two points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we have employed Dirac's bra-ket notation [9][10][11] to define the inertia tensor operator I in Eq. (8). This operator is independent of the choice of bases or coordinate system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we have employed Dirac's bra-ket notation [9][10][11] to define the inertia tensor operator I in Eq. (8). This operator is independent of the choice of bases or coordinate system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After software analysis and calculation, the quality of support frame and mirror is about 0.461 kg during elevating rotation, moment of inertia is 0:000513 kg•m 2 . According to the parallel axis theorem of inertia [21],…”
Section: Design Calculation and Selection Of Key Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, extra care must be taken, as both centres of inertia must be in the same coordinate system before the summation can be performed. This can be easily performed by means of the parallel axis theorem [HV28, Abd17], and translating both moments of inertia to the axis that goes though the total centre of mass CT. Note that this is trivial for the graph, but the calculation for the submerged object is a bit more involved (see Figure 8).…”
Section: Hollow/permeable Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%