2012
DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2012.703791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability theory for the perplexed: A practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68

Abstract: We realize that statistics and mathematics can be either boring or fearsome to many physicians and educators, yet we believe that some foundations are necessary for a better understanding of generalizability analysis. Consequently, we have tried, wherever possible, to keep the use of equations to a minimum and to use a conversational and slightly "off-serious" style.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
243
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
243
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalizability (G) refers to the contribution to the overall variance in scores that can be attributed to the variable under investigation (Bloch & Norman, 2012). In the context of MMIs the G coefficient is the proportion of variance in MMI score that is attributable to differences in applicants' non-cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizability (G) refers to the contribution to the overall variance in scores that can be attributed to the variable under investigation (Bloch & Norman, 2012). In the context of MMIs the G coefficient is the proportion of variance in MMI score that is attributable to differences in applicants' non-cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this weight of literature, the estimation of the error in the standard setting itself has received relatively little attention, particularly in situations where generalizability theory (Bloch & Norman, 2012) may not be easily applicable; for example, in assessment where OSCE stations are not all scored on exactly the same scale.…”
Section: Introduction the Importance Of Quantifying Error In Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AG study uses repeated-measures analysis of variance to simultaneously quantify the variance embedded in each facet that are interacting to create error but is not captured in the inter-item correlation matrices underpinning internal consistency reliability. 31 G studies calculate variance components expressed as a coefficient (EP 2 ), where EP 2 > 0.70 is generally considered the minimum threshold suitable for MSF instruments of similar intent. 32 For all co-worker tools, G studies were performed to estimate the variance associated with different facets: the physician, the coworker, the questionnaire item, and residual error (i.e., measurement artifact).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%