2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability studies of the Global Assessment of Functioning–Split version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
305
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
305
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a national study in Norway, the rate was 42% and differed greatly across regions (16), and there was also a substantial between-ward variance in the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication (17). European and US studies also find geographical variations with regard to the numbers of admissions and acute beds per 1000 inhabitants, staff/patient ratio and assessment and treatment strategies (5,6,16,(18)(19)(20). These variables may also differ across public and private inpatient facilities (21).…”
Section: Acute Psychiatric Admissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a national study in Norway, the rate was 42% and differed greatly across regions (16), and there was also a substantial between-ward variance in the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication (17). European and US studies also find geographical variations with regard to the numbers of admissions and acute beds per 1000 inhabitants, staff/patient ratio and assessment and treatment strategies (5,6,16,(18)(19)(20). These variables may also differ across public and private inpatient facilities (21).…”
Section: Acute Psychiatric Admissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suicidal risk at admission was assessed by rating patients on a scale from 1 to 6, where 1 = 'no risk' and 6 = 'recent severe self-harm with obvious intention to die' (17). Symptom severity and social and occupational functioning were measured by clinicians using the split version of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale (18,19). Psychotic symptoms at the time of admission were assessed by the physician on call using the positive subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (20).…”
Section: Laboratory Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the split version of the Global Assessment of Function (GAF-S and GAF-F) scale. 36 Data on current antipsychotic medication was collected from interviews at time of MRI, by reviewing case notes or at time of the clinical interview. Defined Daily Doses (DDD) 37 were calculated.…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) 27 was used for diagnostic purposes, and global symptomatology and functioning was measured by use of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF; split version). 28 Interrater reliability was good, with an overall kappa score of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.94) for diagnoses and an intraclass correlation coefficient (type 1.1) of 0.86 for both symptom and function GAF scores.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%