2021
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability of findings from a clinical sample to a community‐based sample: A comparison of ADNI and ARIC

Abstract: Introduction Clinic‐based study samples, including the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), offer rich data, but findings may not generalize to community‐based settings. We compared associations in ADNI to those in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study to assess generalizability across the two settings. Methods We estimated cohort‐specific associations among risk factors, cognitive test scores, and neuroimaging outcomes to identify and quantify the extent of significant and substa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we note that previous studies have shown that associations between ε4 and AD have been substantially larger when estimated in clinic‐based samples versus community‐based populations (odds ratio [OR] = 8.6 vs. 2.8, respectively) 41 . Our associations are smaller still.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, we note that previous studies have shown that associations between ε4 and AD have been substantially larger when estimated in clinic‐based samples versus community‐based populations (odds ratio [OR] = 8.6 vs. 2.8, respectively) 41 . Our associations are smaller still.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…One study showed that a significant proportion of the estimates of associations among predictors, cognitive performance, and neuroimaging studies differed between the ADNI cohort and a community-based sample. 42 In addition, the simulated trajectories for CDR-SB in the AD ACE model have not been validated against the community sample, but they do agree well with the mean trajectories from the NACC data set. 9 Another limitation is that our analyses are based on changes in a single measure of clinical outcome (ie, CDR-SB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…31,32 This might be due to the fact that ADNI participants are on average more likely to be male, highly educated, apolipoprotein ε4 positive and less cognitively impaired. 32 Therefore, the results from our study should be confirmed in a community-based sample.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%