2020
DOI: 10.1115/1.4048221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability of Convolutional Encoder–Decoder Networks for Aerodynamic Flow-Field Prediction Across Geometric and Physical-Fluidic Variations

Abstract: The generalizability of a convolutional encoder-decoder based model in predicting aerodynamic flow field across various flow regimes and geometric variation is assessed. A rich master dataset consisting of 11,000+ simulations including cambered, uncambered, thin and thick airfoils simulated at varying angles of attack is generated. The various Mach and Reynolds number (Re) chosen allows analysis across compressible, incompressible, low and high Re flow regimes. Multiple studies are carried out with the model t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers note that the accuracy is greatly increased by using the signed distance function (SDF -see appendix) as a network input instead of a simpler binary representation. Similar work extends these ideas to aerodynamic problems with parametric variation in flow condition and different geometries [7,8]. Pressure and velocity fields for parametric two-dimensional RANS flows around airfoils are predicted with the signed distance field as the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers note that the accuracy is greatly increased by using the signed distance function (SDF -see appendix) as a network input instead of a simpler binary representation. Similar work extends these ideas to aerodynamic problems with parametric variation in flow condition and different geometries [7,8]. Pressure and velocity fields for parametric two-dimensional RANS flows around airfoils are predicted with the signed distance field as the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been used to construct surrogate models of partial differential equations as predictive autoencoders [6,7,8,9], which are sometimes used in conjunction with a time advance model for time varying problems [10,11]. The models may be thought of as image-to-image mappings, where input features are mapped to predicted quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still necessary to enhance the generalization capacity of the existing loss function, which does not incorporate the constraints of the N-S equation. The introduction of the physics-informed neural network (PINN) may improve the model performance and effectively utilize the gradient information in graph neural network calculations [50][51][52]. In the future, the prediction and generalization performance of the model will be further improved by introducing N-S equation constraints, thus improving the interpretability of the model, and optimizing design will be developed based on the learned cascade flow channel characteristics.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Thuerey et al [7] investigated the accuracy of flow field prediction by deep learning model, focusing on how training dataset size and the number of weights affect the prediction accuracy. Finally, Tangsali et al [8] explored the generalization ability of models based on encoder-decoder architecture in predicting aerodynamic flow fields with various geometric changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%