1981
DOI: 10.2307/255572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability of an Organizational Commitment Model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
147
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
147
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schein comprehended "authoritative culture as a subjective procedure of adjustment to the specific differing qualities of hierarchical substance, and reconciliation in this reality". Morris and Sherman (1981) showed that authoritative duty can viably foresee the representative's execution and turnover. It was found that hierarchical responsibility was an appropriate marker of work execution.…”
Section: Organizational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schein comprehended "authoritative culture as a subjective procedure of adjustment to the specific differing qualities of hierarchical substance, and reconciliation in this reality". Morris and Sherman (1981) showed that authoritative duty can viably foresee the representative's execution and turnover. It was found that hierarchical responsibility was an appropriate marker of work execution.…”
Section: Organizational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees' psychosomatic affection to the organisation is called organizational commitment; there are three basic extents of the organizational commitment that are an effective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment (Morris & Sherman, 1981). An organizational commitment is permitted to successfully anticipate the employee satisfaction and performance.…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies designed to ascertain the antecedents of organizational commitment indicate that this form of commitment is a function of personal characteristics (e.g., age, tenure, education, and need for achievement; Steers, 1977, andWelsh &LaVan, 1981) and situational factors related to the job setting (e.g., climate, role conflict, role ambiguity, job and organizational characteristics; Sherman, 1981, andSteers, 1977). The more salient personal factors are those that reflect employees' personal investments in the firm (e.g., preemployment sacrifices to join the organization, pension plans, status and salary levels attributable to seniority).…”
Section: Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, within each work focus category in Exhibit 1, there are some unresolved issues concerning how the subsidiary measures are interrelated. In some instances (e.g., organizational commitment, Morris & Sherman, 1981), the presence of discrepant findings associated with different measures is impeding attempts at generalization. Evidence is needed on the convergent and discriminant validity of these measures.…”
Section: More Rigorous Construct Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed a clear paradigm of enjoyment from sport influenced by motivation and commitment, the outcome of which was a positive share of joy from internal and external motivation and the commitment. In general (Bass, 1985), (Hater and Bass 1988), (Morris and Sherman (1981), have shown in their research that style of leadership is an organizational feature whereby commitment is foreseen. Also Andrew states that studies on athlete's commitment and leadership is very rare to a point where he claims, have not seen any (Andrew 2004), (Glisson and Durick (1988).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Leadermentioning
confidence: 99%