Generalist Palliative Care in the California Safety Net: A Structured Assessment to Design Interventions for a Range of Care Settings

Abstract

Background: To provide high quality care to all patients who have serious illness, health-care systems must develop effective generalist palliative care strategies. Objective: To identify palliative care quality gaps within a range of settings in the California safety net and to develop theory-based interventions to address them. Design: Structured assessment using the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines and a Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational/Environmental Diagnosis and Evaluation intervention planning model-based worksheet, which integrates behavior theories to identify factors that predispose, enable, and reinforce clinicians to perform recommended behaviors. Setting and Participants: Adviser pairs—one from palliative care and one from a partner service line—from 10 California public health-care systems conducted assessments at their sites. A steering committee provided educational webinars, best practices, and assessment tools. Measurements: Adviser pairs interviewed at least 6 partner service line stakeholders to identify palliative care quality gaps, behaviors clinicians should perform to close gaps, and factors that predispose, enable, and reinforce those behaviors. Results: Partner service lines were primary care (n = 4), surgery (n = 3), emergency department (n = 2), and radiation oncology (n = 1). Selected gaps were advance care planning and goals of care communication (n = 6), identifying patients with serious illness (n = 3), and pain management (n = 1). All sites designed multiple interventions to address gaps, based on factors that predispose, enable, and reinforce a target audience to perform a target behavior. Advisers reported that the program strengthened relationships between palliative care and the partner service line Conclusion: This structured assessment helped busy clinicians develop theory-based generalist palliative care interventions.

Intersectoral communication amongst healthcare providers regarding care plans: a scoping review

“… 26 In addition, sources emphasized the transparency of roles. 37 Anderson et al 29 found that EHRs were a barrier to communicating plans as they lacked the proper system- wide rollout to be useful and lead to some miscommunication between providers and finding patient history from other providers.…”

“…32,46 Emphasis was placed on the importance of effectively and accurately identifying patients that needed, or were expected to need, comprehensive care. 29 Comprehensive care entailed using a multi-level lens and enrapturing multiple healthcare viewpoints, being part of a multidimensional practice could add in this practice 29 as well as triaging and calling on community resources if needed. 36 When the care plan was comprehensive and multidisciplinary, patients viewed their entirety of care from a team-based and holistic perspective.…”