2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalised stacking fault energy of Ni-Al and Co-Al-W superalloys: Density-functional theory calculations

Abstract: Generalised stacking fault energy surfaces (Γ-surfaces) are calculated for CoAl -W-based and Ni-Al-based superalloys from first-principles calculations. A Special Quasi-random Structure is employed in the calculation of the ternary compound, Co 3 (Al,W). Phase field simulations are used to compare dislocation cores present in Co-based and Ni-based superalloys. The higher planar fault energies of the Co-based system lead to a more constricted dislocation which can have implications on both the bowing of disloca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ni 3 Al (at x = 0), our computed energy of the intrinsic stacking fault is 0.054 J/m 2 ; this value reasonably agrees with those ranging from 0.037 to 0.092 J/m 2 in the literature [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Depending on the distance L between the periodic stacking faults in a supercell, the intrinsic stacking fault energy varies from 0.065 J/m 2 at L ≈ 10 Å to 0.054 J/m 2 at L > 40 Å; a monotonic decrease in energy with distance at L > 10 Å points at repulsion between the stacking faults.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Ni 3 Al (at x = 0), our computed energy of the intrinsic stacking fault is 0.054 J/m 2 ; this value reasonably agrees with those ranging from 0.037 to 0.092 J/m 2 in the literature [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Depending on the distance L between the periodic stacking faults in a supercell, the intrinsic stacking fault energy varies from 0.065 J/m 2 at L ≈ 10 Å to 0.054 J/m 2 at L > 40 Å; a monotonic decrease in energy with distance at L > 10 Å points at repulsion between the stacking faults.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dislocation density in the γ channel decreased significantly, and the dislocations accumulated at the γ/γ interfaces and partially formed the dislocation networks. Different from cryogenic temperatures and room temperature, the γ phase was cut in the form of dislocations because of its high stacking fault energy at high temperature [23].…”
Section: Dislocation Configuration Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the cryogenic temperature and room temperature, the critical shear stress of the sliding system is reduced at 1000 • C [24]; the tertiary γ phase in the γ channel dissolved, and the strength of the γ phase was greatly reduced [11,25], thus the dislocation was easy to start and had no obstruction in the γ channel. At 1000 • C, the stacking fault energy of the alloy was high [23], which means the dislocation was prone to cut in the secondary γ phase directly without stacking faults or bypassing the secondary γ phase through cross-slip, and without causing strain hardening. Therefore, the yield strength and ultimate strength decreased and the elongation rose significantly at 1000 • C in comparison with cryogenic temperatures and room temperature.…”
Section: Dislocation Configuration Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the configuration space to be probed is larger in CoNi-base compositions than in Co-base and Ni-base compositions, deriving PFEs from state-of-the-art methods is not trivial. Alternatively, Hasan et al (159) proposed averaging schemes using Vegard's law of mixtures to estimate PFEs from Co 3 X and Ni 3 X binary compounds. Most fault energies of multicomponent compositions calculated with this approach were negative.…”
Section: Alloying Effects In Ni- Co- and Coni-base Superalloysmentioning
confidence: 99%