2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.04059
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalised representations as q-connections in integral $p$-adic Hodge theory

Matthew Morrow,
Takeshi Tsuji

Abstract: We relate various approaches to coefficient systems in relative integral p-adic Hodge theory, working in the geometric context over the ring of integers of a perfectoid field. These include small generalised representations over A inf inspired by Faltings, modules with q-connection in the sense of q-de Rham cohomology, crystals on the prismatic site of Bhatt-Scholze, and q-deformations of Higgs bundles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Theorem 4.4 shows that the existence of the Frobenius structure ensures the condition (3) in Definition 5.1, especially the pseudo-nilpotency condition. This is similar to the phenomenon appearing in [MT20]. Conversely, if one can prove that the Frobenius structure implies the condition (3) in Definition 5.1, Theorem 5.2 then follows.…”
Section: Prismatic Crystalssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, Theorem 4.4 shows that the existence of the Frobenius structure ensures the condition (3) in Definition 5.1, especially the pseudo-nilpotency condition. This is similar to the phenomenon appearing in [MT20]. Conversely, if one can prove that the Frobenius structure implies the condition (3) in Definition 5.1, Theorem 5.2 then follows.…”
Section: Prismatic Crystalssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A posteriori, the existence of the Frobenius ensures the "nilpotency" of the τ -connection after [BS21] and [DL21]. This is similar to the phenomenon appearing in [MT20]. We can show this is true in the three cases above, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations