2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2018.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalised contact geometry as reduced generalised Complex geometry

Abstract: Generalised contact structures are studied from the point of view of reduced generalised complex structures, naturally incorporating non-coorientable structures as non-trivial fibering. The infinitesimal symmetries are described in detail, with a geometric description given in terms of gerbes. As an application of the reduction procedure, generalised coKähler structures are defined in a way which extends the Kähler/coKähler correspondence.1 where H ∈ Ω 3 cl (M ), is given by(for details see [5]). The Leibniz i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of our analysis above of the classical Sasakian case, we propose that a definition of a generalized Sasakian structure on a manifold M should be in terms of families of commuting pair of generalized almost contact metric structures (M, Φ, E ± , G) and (M, Φ, Ẽ± , G) satisfying the condition E ± = Ẽ± or the condition E ± = Ẽ∓ and such that Φ, and Φ are integrable with respect to a derived bracket. There have been previous definitions proposed for the notion of generalized Sasakian by Vaisman [16][17][18], Sekiya [15], Inglesias-Ponte and Wade [10], and Wright [19] all specific to the situation M × R + . Vasiman and Sekiya define Sasakian in terms of integrability of generalized almost complex structures on M × R + as opposed to defining the concept in terms of the intrinsic data on M .…”
Section: Implications For Generalized Sasakian and Generalized Co-käh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of our analysis above of the classical Sasakian case, we propose that a definition of a generalized Sasakian structure on a manifold M should be in terms of families of commuting pair of generalized almost contact metric structures (M, Φ, E ± , G) and (M, Φ, Ẽ± , G) satisfying the condition E ± = Ẽ± or the condition E ± = Ẽ∓ and such that Φ, and Φ are integrable with respect to a derived bracket. There have been previous definitions proposed for the notion of generalized Sasakian by Vaisman [16][17][18], Sekiya [15], Inglesias-Ponte and Wade [10], and Wright [19] all specific to the situation M × R + . Vasiman and Sekiya define Sasakian in terms of integrability of generalized almost complex structures on M × R + as opposed to defining the concept in terms of the intrinsic data on M .…”
Section: Implications For Generalized Sasakian and Generalized Co-käh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we will be interested in simpler situations and comment on the heterotic case in the concluding section. Nonclosed 3-forms may also arise upon dimensional reduction in the target space, for instance when it has the structure of a circle fibration [23,24] and more generally in reduction of Courant algebroids [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Abelian case, we find that gauge invariance of the gauged theory imposes additional constraints, as expected from the corresponding results with closed 3-form. These constraints acquire an elegant geometric interpretation when one considers the structure of a contact Courant algebroid over the extended vector bundle T M ⊕R⊕R⊕T * M twisted by three tensors, specifically a 3-form H and two 2-forms Ω and F whose product controls the 4-form dH [23,29]; they are identified with conditions for Dirac structures of the twisted contact Courant algebroid. The same geometric interpretation persists in the more general, non-Abelian case, with the difference that the corresponding higher structure is a nonexact Courant algebroid of the type described in [27], over an extended bundle T M ⊕ G ⊕ T * M , with G a bundle of quadratic Lie algebras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that there are various approaches to define odd dimensional analogues of D n -geometry (see e.g. [12,15,10]). In this paper we adopt the viewpoint of [11] and, in analogy with [8], we define generalized pseudo-Kähler structures on odd exact Courant algebroids as an enrichment of B ngeneralized complex structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%