2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7303-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalised Compositional Theories and Diagrammatic Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are both equality in the path-sum framework. While much progress has been made towards computational methods for diagrammatic reasoning [9,11,13,15], our framework allows us to use standard algebraic tools (e.g., rewriting) without explicitly managing structural laws.…”
Section: Definition 26 (Sequential Composition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are both equality in the path-sum framework. While much progress has been made towards computational methods for diagrammatic reasoning [9,11,13,15], our framework allows us to use standard algebraic tools (e.g., rewriting) without explicitly managing structural laws.…”
Section: Definition 26 (Sequential Composition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the convex set framework one generally starts from convex sets associated with individual systems, and builds composites from them, the OPT framework takes the composition of physical processes as primitive. Mathematically, the 'top-down' approach of the OPT framework is underpinned by the graphical language of circuits [75][76][77][78][79][80]. In this section we give an informal presentation, referring the reader to the original articles for a more in-depth discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a diagram D : n → m we define its adjoint D † : m → n to be the diagram obtained by reflecting the diagram around the vertical axis and negating all the angles. Thus the terms of the ZX-calculus naturally form a a †-PROP [8,10], just like the Clifford circuits of the previous section. The three types of single vertex shown in Figure 1 can then be seen as the generators of this PROP, which we call ZX.…”
Section: The Zx-calculusmentioning
confidence: 87%