2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25516-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalised Complementary Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose constructions for complementary 4-sets instead of complementary pairs, having a very simple graphical description and with pairwise Hamming distance ≥ 2 n−2 . We show how this is a special case of the general array construction given in [8], and clarify aspects of section 5 of [10]. Our construction also generalizes a more explicit construction in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we propose constructions for complementary 4-sets instead of complementary pairs, having a very simple graphical description and with pairwise Hamming distance ≥ 2 n−2 . We show how this is a special case of the general array construction given in [8], and clarify aspects of section 5 of [10]. Our construction also generalizes a more explicit construction in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We show how this is a special case of the general array construction given in [8], and clarify aspects of section 5 of [10]. Our construction also generalizes a more explicit construction in [8]. Lower and upper bounds on the number of sequences generated are analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work was subsequently extended by [22,26,27] and by numerous other authors [31]. [19,20,17,10,15,21] show that the complementary set construction is primarily an array construction, where sequence sets are obtained by considering suitable projections of the arrays. It is desirable to propose complementary constructions that significantly improve set size without greatly compromising the upper bound on PAPR or the pairwise distinguishability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%