2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31985-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalisable 3D printing error detection and correction via multi-head neural networks

Abstract: Material extrusion is the most widespread additive manufacturing method but its application in end-use products is limited by vulnerability to errors. Humans can detect errors but cannot provide continuous monitoring or real-time correction. Existing automated approaches are not generalisable across different parts, materials, and printing systems. We train a multi-head neural network using images automatically labelled by deviation from optimal printing parameters. The automation of data acquisition and label… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent limitations of parts created using AM, including structural flaws diminished strength between layers, shape deformation, machine failures, and the additional material required to create supports for overhanging regions, pose substantial barriers to its adoption as a mainstream technology. Because of this, a growing field of research has centered on overcoming these limitations through the use of AI systems.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The apparent limitations of parts created using AM, including structural flaws diminished strength between layers, shape deformation, machine failures, and the additional material required to create supports for overhanging regions, pose substantial barriers to its adoption as a mainstream technology. Because of this, a growing field of research has centered on overcoming these limitations through the use of AI systems.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…271 Notably, computational tools that improve these areas may also be applied to other applications such as recyclability of materials for large-scale applications such as printing with recycled concrete. 279 The apparent limitations of parts created using AM, including structural flaws 280 diminished strength between layers, 281 shape deformation, 282 machine failures, 283 and the additional material required to create supports for overhanging regions, 284 pose substantial barriers to its adoption as a mainstream technology. Because of this, a growing field of research has centered on overcoming these limitations through the use of AI systems.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, Luyang Xu et al proposed an improved model based on the YOLO v4 network structure to detect ow defects [6]. Douglas A. J. Brion et al proposed a method for detecting and correcting 3D printing errors using a multi-head neural network [7]. Guo Dong Goh et al proposed four trained models, YOLOv3 and YOLOv4, including their "tiny" variants [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reviews show that thermal and optical methods, the ones most commonly used, have already been successfully demonstrated for defect detection and closed-loop control purposes. State-of-the-art examples of this are geometry monitoring through optical measurements with a digital twin 11 , real-time defect detection through measuring of melt pool temperature deviations 12 , real-time defect detection through comparison of combined thermal and optical imaging to a baseline 13 , real-time error detection and correction with cameras in combination with large-scale machine learning 5 and a method to link real-time defect detection with an optical camera to structural part quality 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers simplicity, low cost and a wide variety of available materials and is therefore used in applications as diverse as aerospace, automotive, electronics, prosthetics, fashion, construction and education 2,3 . Despite its advantages, FFF is vulnerable to errors and failures due to uncertainties in equipment and process, limiting its consistency and time-and resource-efficiency 4,5 . These failures typically result in geometric deviations, voids, warping, compromised mechanical properties, delamination, lack of material and bad surface quality 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%